ArticleScientific reports2026
Transforming ceramic residues into circular economy solutions in geotechnical engineering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The escalating ecological concerns related to ceramic residue disposal have encouraged their valorization in geotechnical engineering as a sustainable alternative. This study evaluates the effectiveness of ceramic waste calcined at 900 °C (CW), used alone or with 2% ordinary Portland cement (OPC), for improving low-bearing-capacity clay soils. CW was incorporated from 3 to 18%, and its effects were assessed using methylene blue value (MBV), Atterberg limits (LL, PL, PI), compaction (MDD), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and compressibility (Cc, Cs). Response surface methodology (RSM), supported by ANOVA and regression modeling, was used for optimization and prediction. Results showed significant improvements: MBV decreased by 59.19% at 18% CW; MDD increased by 5.57% and up to 7.55% with OPC. The liquid limit decreased by 23.83% at 9% CW, while the plastic limit dropped to 21.9% at 15% CW and to 20.45% with 12% CW + 2% OPC (- 37.71%). The lowest PI was obtained at 9% CW, reaching 24.06%, corresponding to a reduction of approximately 28.44% compared with the untreated clay. The CBR increased by 351.67% with OPC. UCS improved by 321.71% at 9% CW and reached 698.76% with 9% CW + 2% OPC after 56 days. Compressibility parameters were reduced, with Cs and Cc decreasing by 73.56 and 59.49% at 9% CW, and by 79.58 and 72.46% with OPC. The developed models showed high predictive accuracy (R² ranging from 0.77 to 0.98, p < 0.0001). These findings confirm that calcined ceramic waste, particularly combined with OPC, is an effective and sustainable solution for soil stabilization, supporting circular economy practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.