ArticleScientific reports2026
Learning curve of a robotic knee system in total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotically assisted knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is more time consuming, with a more extended learning curve than manual knee arthroplasty (mTKA). Our study aimed to estimate the learning curve of an experienced orthopaedic surgeon to achieve comparable mean operative time between rTKA and mTKA and we also compaired the early complications. The prospective comparative study included 150 Persona PS rTKA and 150 Evolution medial pivot mTKA. The surgeries were performed consecutively by 3 senior surgeons, 50 rTKN and 50 mTKA for each surgeon, between January 2023 and August 2025 and we compaired the operative time and the complications related to surgery between the 2 groups for each surgeon to establish the learning curve for knee robotic surgery. The consecutive cases in each group were divided in ten sugroups, each of 10 cases. The groups were compaired concerning age, sex, BMI and Kellgren-Lawrence classification. The first non-significant difference between the mTKAs and rTKAs operative times was observed in the subgroup of 30 to 40 cases. Till then, the operative time has been significantly lower for mTKA than the rTKA group of cases. The group of ten cases between 30 and 40 showed no operative time differences for all the surgeons. The learning curve analysis demonstrated that the surgeon becomes used and comfortable with surgery technique from case 33 onwards. Both groups had no differences regarding the complications rates. The study showed that about 30 cases are needed for a senior surgeon to balance operative time between mTKA and rTKA using the ROSA system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.