Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230929›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026

Machine learning and deep learning-based drug-drug interactions prediction: a systematic review focused on anticancer drugs.

Yingying Zhao, Jiaqi Wang, Jiyeong Kim, Fatima Rodriguez, Eleni Linos, Rong Na, Khuloud T Al-Jamal, Xue Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingying Zhao *Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jiaqi Wang *Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jiyeong KimStanford Center for Digital Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Fatima RodriguezStanford Center for Digital Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Eleni LinosStanford Center for Digital Health, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rong NaDepartment of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Khuloud T Al-JamalDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Xue LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. sxueli@hku.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer patients are particularly susceptible to Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) due to frequent polypharmacy in oncology care. Co-administered drugs can increase toxicity or reduce effectiveness, potentially causing serious adverse events-for example, QTc-prolonging Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors with CYP3A4 inhibitors can lead to torsade de pointes. Traditional DDI identification methods are time-consuming and costly, relying mainly on in vitro and in vivo wet lab experiments, clinical studies, or post-marketing surveillance. Many Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL)-based DDI prediction models have been developed in recent decades to accelerate the identification of DDIs. We systematically reviewed ML- and DL-based DDI prediction models involving anticancer drugs. Key features of anticancer drugs involved and details of prediction models, such as the prediction tasks (existence or types of DDI) and performance, were summarised, as well as a list of newly predicted DDIs. Additionally, verification through up-to-date DrugBank and Drugs.com confirmed 22 of 96 newly predicted potential DDI drug pairs, demonstrating the practical value of these techniques. By understanding the current DDI prediction studies from both methodological and clinical standpoints, novel approaches may be tailored to the unique characteristics of oncology drugs, thereby enhancing the clinical relevance and applicability of DDI predictions.

Identifiers

PMID42230929
PMCPMC13550451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.