Observational studyScientific reports2026
Predicting diffusion-FLAIR mismatch from B1000 and ADC without FLAIR: A deep learning-based approach.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diffusion-FLAIR mismatch (DFM), defined as the discrepancy between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FLAIR sequences, is a key imaging biomarker used to identify patients with unclear symptom onset or those likely to benefit from recanalization therapy. However, FLAIR imaging is often limited in acute clinical settings due to time constraints, patient instability, or scanner availability. Therefore, alternative approaches to assess DFM without relying on FLAIR are needed. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model that predicts DFM using only B1000 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) images, and to evaluate its performance. This study was conducted using multicenter stroke registry-based cohorts. After excluding cases not suitable for analysis, 2,369 cases were included in the derivation cohort for model development, and 679 cases from two independent stroke centers were included as external validation cohorts. Model performance was assessed based on two binary classification schemes. The Broad classification included all non-match cases, comprising both clearly defined mismatches and ambiguous cases with subtle or focal FLAIR changes, while the Focused classification excluded such ambiguous cases, including only clearly defined match and mismatch instances. In the Focused classification setting, the AI model achieved an AUROC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.95) on the external validation dataset, significantly outperforming the average AUROC of human experts, which was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87) (p < 0.001, AUROC difference 0.10). Overall, the Focused classification yielded higher performance than the Broad classification, and this trend was consistent for both the AI model and human readers. We developed a deep learning-based classifier capable of predicting DFM using only B1000 and ADC images, without requiring FLAIR. The model outperformed human experts and demonstrates potential as a complementary diagnostic tool in acute stroke settings where FLAIR imaging is unavailable, supporting its future integration into decision-support systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.