ArticleScientific reports2026
Using intersectionality to explore physical activity participation amongst individuals with vision loss from ethnic minority backgrounds in the United Kingdom.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Participation in physical activity (PA) is essential for maintaining health and mobility. Although women, individuals from ethnic minority backgrounds, and people experiencing vision loss are reportedly the least active of their respective identity classifications literature is yet to acknowledge the intersectional nature of group identification, and the ways in which barriers and facilitators to PA might vary or compound in instances of multiple-minority status. Fifteen people with vision loss (six male) from different cultural backgrounds (six White: nine South Asian) were interviewed. Reflexive thematic analysis, underpinned by an interpretivist epistemology and relativist ontology, was used to analyse data. Participants identified neglect at a governmental level as the most significant barrier to PA, producing inaccessible environments that are infrastructurally inequitable. Female South Asian participants' barriers to PA were nuanced by the intersectionality of their multiple identity positioning (gender, race, and disability). The cultural expectations placed on South Asian women, specifically those pertaining to modesty and gender, limited their capacity to engage in a physically active lifestyle. Comparisons made between the experiences of White and South Asian participants highlighted a lack of acceptance towards disabled individuals in the South Asian community. This study provided insight as to how experiences of inequality intersect and require holistic means of intervention. Governmental bodies and social innovators should strive to create spaces which are architecturally appropriate for people with vision loss, and work with sporting facilities such as gyms to centralise marginalised communities in their design to provide services which are both accessible and culturally viable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.