ArticleScientific reports2026
A multidimensional reliability-enhanced belief rule base model for fault diagnosis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fault diagnosis is essential for the safe and stable operation of industrial equipment and for improving maintenance efficiency. The belief rule base (BRB) is well suited to fault diagnosis under complex conditions because of its strengths in knowledge representation and uncertainty reasoning. However, traditional BRB still faces three limitations in multi-class diagnosis: rule-scale expansion, insufficient use of feature reliability during inference, and inadequate exploitation of output reliability from multiple submodels. To address these issues, this study proposes a reliability-enhanced one-versus-rest BRB method, termed RE-OvR-BRB. First, the OvR strategy decomposes the multi-class task into binary subtasks and constructs parallel BRB submodels to reduce rule-combination complexity. Second, a multidimensional reliability modeling scheme is proposed, which incorporates feature-level reliability into matching calculation, rule activation, and evidence fusion, and further integrates submodel output-level reliability into the final decision fusion. Third, a decision fusion mechanism considering submodel output reliability is introduced to improve the robustness of multi-class decisions. Experiments on the CWRU bearing dataset and the UConn gear dataset show that the proposed method outperforms competing methods in classification accuracy, decision confidence, and noise robustness, demonstrating its effectiveness under complex industrial conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.