ArticleScientific reports2026
Early antifungal resistance prediction based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Therapeutic Challenges and Novel Treatment Options in Mitigating Invasive Mycosis Associated withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Benchmarking deep learning architectures for MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in infectious disease diagnostics and vector-borne disease surveillance.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health threat. Recent studies have shown that combining MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with machine learning algorithms can accelerate AMR determination. However, these efforts have predominantly focused on bacterial pathogens. The significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs associated with fungal infections highlight the need for accurate and early detection of antifungal resistance. We developed a machine learning pipeline integrating MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry data and drug features to predict antifungal resistance and identify spectral biomarkers. By leveraging the DRIAMS dataset, we included 658 pathogen spectra linked to 3,046 phenotypic antifungal resistance results across three drug classes and seven yeast species. Models were trained using categorical phenotypic antifungal susceptibility testing results as ground truth. We systematically investigated how different dimensionality reduction methods, antifungal encodings, and model types affected predictive performance using nested cross-validation. We identified that applying principal component analysis to MALDI-TOF mass spectra, and training a multi-layer perceptron yielded the highest and most stable performance for the prediction of antifungal resistance. Our method achieved an AUPRC of 0.77 across the 10 highest-performing species-drug pairs. The model demonstrated the best performance for the species-drug combinations of Candida albicans with micafungin, Candida parapsilosis with fluconazole, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with itraconazole and fluconazole. By comparing established species-based guidelines, susceptibility test results, and machine learning predictions, we estimated that integrating our algorithm into antifungal selection could help avoid prescriptions to likely resistant pathogens in approximately 3 out of 10 patients for whom standard guidelines recommend such treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.