ArticleScientific reports2026
Application of CW-RNN model in network attack detection and its promotion to the governance of international law.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the core issue of insufficient modeling of multi-time-scale temporal features in modern network attack detection, this study proposes a network attack detection model based on Clock-Work Recurrent Neural Network (CW-RNN). The model introduces a time-division processing mechanism, divides hidden layer neurons into modular structures with different clock frequencies, and integrates an attention mechanism to enhance feature extraction in key attack stages. An end-to-end intelligent detection architecture is constructed, which can adaptively capture characteristics of both short-term burst attacks and long-term latent attacks. Experimental verification is conducted on two benchmark datasets: University of New South Wales Network Benchmark 2015 (UNSW-NB15) and Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity-Intrusion Detection Systems 2018 (CSE-CIC-IDS2018). The results show that the detection accuracies of the proposed CW-RNN model on the two datasets reach 95.8% and 95.2%, respectively, and the macro-average F1-scores are 94.2% and 93.6%, respectively, which are significantly superior to mainstream benchmark models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Meanwhile, the training time of the model is reduced by 25%, and the inference speed is increased by more than 18%, achieving dual optimization in detection accuracy and computational efficiency. Its modular multi-time-scale processing design provides an efficient and practical technical solution for network attack detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.