ReviewMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Hydrogel soft tissue expander for gingiva-periosteal expansion: a narrative literature review.
Review in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSoft tissue expanders (STEs) are used in reconstructive surgeries to stretch tissues gradually, providing space for implants or facilitating bone augmentation. These devices have evolved from traditional silicone balloon expanders to modern self-inflating osmotic systems, which offer more controlled and less invasive expansion. This review explores the advancements in STEs, particularly the use of hydrogels, and their applications in clinical settings. MAIN TEXT: Recent studies indicate that tissue expansion facilitates soft tissue growth through mechanical stretch and biological creep, enhancing vascularity and promoting fibroblast proliferation. The extracellular matrix transmits mechanical forces that influence cell behavior, while excessive pressure may lead to bone resorption, soft tissue necrosis, and expander exposure. Modern STEs include hydrogel-based, self-inflating types that absorb interstitial fluids to enable gradual expansion. These devices offer advantages such as biocompatibility, minimal scarring, and simplified surgical procedures. However, complications such as temporary deformity, hypoxia, allergic reactions, and infection remain important clinical concerns.
conclusionHydrogels in STEs need to balance effective expansion with minimal toxicity or morbidity. A key challenge is finding a patient-compliant, economic solution for tissue expansion before bone augmentation. Proper understanding and application of STEs can lead to successful outcomes in reconstructive surgery. Despite the usefulness of STEs, a comprehensive synthesis of their underlying biological mechanisms, clinical applications, and recent research developments is currently lacking. This review aims to fill that gap by summarizing the molecular and physical mechanisms of soft tissue growth, highlighting key factors that regulate expansion, and providing an updated overview of STEs and hydrogel technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.