Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230847›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An explainable machine learning approach to predict fragility fractures and the identification of important features.

Sayem Borhan, Alexandra Papaioannou, Jonathan Adachi, Shrey Acharya, Suzanne N Morin, David Goltzman, David A Hanley, Claudie Berger, Lehana Thabane, Parminder Raina

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sayem BorhanDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Martha Wing, H321, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y3, Canada. borhana@mcmaster.ca.
Alexandra PapaioannouMcMaster Institute for Research on Aging (MIRA), McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jonathan AdachiDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Shrey AcharyaMichael DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Suzanne N MorinDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David GoltzmanDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David A HanleyDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Claudie BergerResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Martha Wing, H321, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y3, Canada.
Parminder RainaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Martha Wing, H321, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y3, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we developed ML algorithms to predict fragility fractures, considering the occurrence of fractures at different skeletal sites, using the data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) with participants aged 50 years or older. We considered 73 baseline features, and the outcome was the first incidence of fracture at any of the following sites: hip, spine, pelvis, ribs, shoulder, and forearm. The ML algorithms were evaluated in terms of the ROC_AUC. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was performed to identify the important features and to investigate the interaction among these features. In total, 7753 subjects were included in the study. Approximately 72% were female, and the average age was 67 years. We found that the XGBoost algorithm had a slightly better ROC_AUC (0.70; 95% CI 0.67, 0.73). From the SHAP analysis, we found that BMD was the most important feature and the total hip BMD interacted the most with femoral neck BMD. This study demonstrated that XGBoost was a marginally superior ML algorithm for predicting fragility fractures. In addition, we identified important features that contribute to the prediction of fragility fractures. Intervention focusing on these features will help to prevent the incidence of these fractures.

Indexed as

Machine LearningOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAlgorithmsBone DensityBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCanadaClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsROC CurveDeep learningFragility fracturesMachine learningPredictionSHAPXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42230847
PMCPMC13230636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.