ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigating the structure of the greylag goose vocal repertoire: what can unsupervised methods tell us?
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Defining a comprehensive signal repertoire is an important step to understanding a species' vocal communication system. Here, we investigated the vocal repertoire of a well-investigated model species in ethology: the greylag goose (Anser anser). We applied unsupervised machine learning algorithms to a large dataset of vocalisations from a free-living population of greylag geese to investigate the acoustic structure of this species' vocal signals. We extracted four types of data representations, which were projected into 2, 20 and 100 dimensions using the UMAP algorithm, and then grouped using two commonly used clustering methods. Additionally, we successfully applied a graph-based clustering approach - Leiden community detection - which, to our knowledge, has not previously been employed in bioacoustics. Our analyses revealed a partly graded vocal repertoire that broadly matched early descriptions of the greylag goose call repertoire. Audio feature vectors, rather than more commonly used spectrographic representations, revealed clusters most congruent with human labels and offered the most comprehensive visualisation of the acoustic space. Leiden community detection performed comparably to established approaches but matched the number of human-defined classes closest. These findings highlight the impact of data representation on repertoire analysis and provide the first objective, quantitative characterisation of the greylag goose vocal repertoire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.