ArticleScientific reports2026
Fine-grained evaluation of neighborhood quality in China using street view images and big data technologies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the advent of the post-materialist and post-industrialization era, quality of place has gradually become a hotspot of urban research. But the research has mainly focused on the city or national scale, and there is a lack of exploration on the small scale within the city. In this paper, we take neighborhoods as the research scale, design a neighborhood quality assessment system that can measure both the soft and hard environments of cities by using big data technologies such as deep learning and street view images to obtain microdata at the neighborhood level, and the entropy method was used to assess the quality of 5829 major neighborhoods (sub-districts) in 232 prefecture-level cities across China. The assessment results demonstrate that: (1) In China, the construction of "soft" environment is more important for enhancing the neighborhood quality. (2) Most of the high-quality neighborhoods in China are located in its economically developed regions, indicating that the enhancement of neighborhood quality is, to some extent, dependent on a region's economic level. (3) High-quality neighborhoods have been constructed in a relatively balanced manner in all dimensions, while low-quality neighborhoods show obvious deficiencies in the dimension of creativity. (4) Lastly, this paper includes a heterogeneity analysis on the neighborhood quality of cities in different regions, at different administrative levels, and with different industrial focuses, which reveals that even though China's construction efforts on "hard" environments of cities are pretty much the same, significant differences exist in those on "soft environment". This paper not only enriches the body of literature in the field of place quality but also provides significant theoretical support for urban planners and policymakers in planning and design, urban renewal, and the optimization of urbanization policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.