Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230791›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Modeling soil water distribution under drip fertigation in chrysanthemum across soil types using HYDRUS-2D.

Atish Sagar, Murtaza Hasan, Dhirendra Kumar Singh, Ali Salem, Dinesh Kumar Vishwakarma, Ozgur Kisi, Pankaj Malkani, Ahmed Elbeltagi, Kadambot H M Siddique, Mohamed A Mattar

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Atish SagarDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Murtaza HasanCentre for Protected Cultivation Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Dhirendra Kumar SinghDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ali SalemCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Minia, 61111, Egypt. salem.ali@mik.pte.hu.
Dinesh Kumar VishwakarmaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Clement Town, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248002, India. dinesh.vishwakarma4820@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-6995
Ozgur KisiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lübeck University of Applied Sciences, Lübeck, 23562, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7847-5872
Pankaj MalkaniDivision of Agricultural Engineering, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 110012, India.
Ahmed ElbeltagiAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5506-9502
Kadambot H M SiddiqueThe UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia.
Mohamed A MattarPrince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz International Prize for Water Chair, Prince Sultan Institute for Environmental, Water and Desert Research, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2454, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia. mmattar@ksu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient water management is critical for sustainable chrysanthemum production under protected cultivation was conducted at Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, India. While HYDRUS-based models are widely used for simulating soil water dynamics under drip irrigation, their application in floriculture crops remains limited, particularly for deriving crop-specific irrigation strategies. This study integrates field experimentation (2020-2023) with HYDRUS-2D simulations to evaluate soil water distribution under drip fertigation across multiple soil types. The effects of emitter discharge, irrigation scheduling, and soil hydraulic properties were analyzed to determine optimal root-zone moisture conditions. Results showed that soil moisture remained within the optimal range for up to 48 h after irrigation under appropriate scheduling. Among soil types, moisture retention followed the order: silt ≈ silty clay loam > loam > sandy clay loam > sandy loam. Model validation demonstrated high accuracy (R

Indexed as

Emitter dischargeHYDRUS 2DModellingMoisture contentSimulation

Identifiers

PMID42230791
PMCPMC13338146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.