ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Deep learning prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer using Mamba architecture.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep learning is capable of efficiently predicting the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer. However, current methods predominantly rely on convolutional neural networks or transformer architectures and are often validated in small patient cohorts. We developed a Mamba-based deep learning model for predicting chemotherapy efficacy using needle biopsy (MCEN) from 1646 patients with breast cancer across five tertiary hospitals, aiming to predict pathological complete response following NAC. We randomly divided 1023 biopsy samples from one hospital into training and validation sets at an 8:2 ratio and used the remaining four hospitals as external test sets to evaluate the model's performance and robustness. In the training and validation sets, the MCEN achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of 0.923 and 0.78, respectively. For the four external test sets, the MCEN achieved AUROCs ranging from 0.761- to 0.809. Incorporating clinicopathological information improved the MCEN model's predictive performance, achieving AUROCs of 0.937 and 0.811 in the training and validation sets, respectively, and ranging from 0.773- to 0.84 in the external test sets. Our study demonstrates the potential of the MCEN as a valuable tool in clinical decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.