ArticleScientific reports2026
Bletilla striata polysaccharide modified glass ionomer cement: enhanced mechanical and biological properties.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate the mechanical and biological properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) reinforced with Bletilla striata (Thunb.) polysaccharide (BSP). BSP was incorporated into the GIC liquid phase at concentrations of 0 wt% (control group), 3 wt%, 5 wt%, 7 wt% (experimental group) by weight. Compressive strength (n = 10 per group), flexural strength (n = 15 per group), microtensile bond strength and failure mode (n = 20 per group), surface hardness (n = 20 per group), surface roughness (n = 6 per group), surface characterization, cell viability and morphology were evaluated. Data were submitted to Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA and Tukey tests. The 5 wt% BSP-GIC group exhibited the highest values for compressive strength, flexural strength and surface hardness, microtensile bond strength values among all groups. However, the 5 wt% BSP-GIC group showed the lowest value in surface roughness without significance (p > 0.05). Among all the tested factor, 3 wt% and 7 wt% BSP-GIC groups showed similar microtensile bond strength values. Mixed failure was observed in all groups. The experimental biomaterials also demonstrated no significant cytotoxic potential. The study revealed that addition of 5 wt% BSP significantly enhances compressive strength, flexural strength, surface hardness and microtensile bond strength of GIC. Furthermore, 5 wt% BSP-GIC demonstrates the highest mechanical properties among them, which indicates a potential application in dental restorative field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.