ArticleNature medicine2026
Medically tailored meals receipt and healthcare utilization and costs in Massachusetts' Medicaid demonstration.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Translating 'food is medicine' from concept to reality.Nature medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Smaller quasi-experimental studies and short-term controlled trials of medically tailored meals (MTMs) have shown health benefits for several conditions, but MTMs have not been evaluated in large-scale policy initiatives. Multiple US states are now implementing MTMs in Medicaid, the health insurance program for low-income individuals, yet their impact has not been evaluated. We investigated changes in hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits and healthcare costs among 1,866 MTM recipients and 1,372 comparators from 2020 to 2023 across 11 health systems in Massachusetts. Both groups met eligibility criteria for diet-related conditions and food insecurity. We used propensity overlap-weighted generalized estimating equations to compare a 6-month baseline period to the program period. MTM receipt (mean, 6.7 months) was associated with 31% fewer hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) = 0.69 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.58-0.82)), 20% fewer ED visits (aIRR = 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.89)) and US$3,433 lower total healthcare costs (95% CI: $-1,215 to -$5,651). Healthcare cost reductions offset 98% of the MTM program costs during the enrollment period. Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses, a negative control test and a secondary comparison group. In stratified analyses, MTM receipt was net cost-saving among participants with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, depression, diabetes or high comorbidity. This large MTM policy evaluation informs consideration of 'food is medicine' therapies in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.