ArticleCommunications biology2026
DeepRank-Ab: a scoring function for antibody-antigen complexes based on geometric deep learning.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining AI Structure Prediction and Integrative Modeling for Nanobody-Antigen Complexes.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- ABAG-Rank: improving model selection of AlphaFold antibody-antigen complexes by learning to rank.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Benchmarking AlphaFold and related deep learning approaches for modeling antibody and TCR antigen recognition.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- AbTune: layer-wise selective fine-tuning of protein language models for antibodies.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gaining structural insights into antibody-antigen interactions is essential for understanding immune recognition and therapeutics design. Accurately modeling these complexes remains challenging for both physics-based approaches and AI-based, co-folding methods such as AlphaFold3. These methods not only struggle to generate near-native conformations, but, more critically, often fail to rank those correctly, revealing fundamental limitations for antibody-antigen modeling. We present DeepRank-Ab, a geometric deep learning-based scoring function tailored to antibody-antigen interfaces, together with a rigorously curated benchmark of ~2.3 million decoys from 1,442 complexes, providing the diversity required for robust training and unbiased evaluation. We systematically assessed graph representations, structural and energetic features, and sampling strategies. Our analysis identified that atom-level representations coupled with Voronoi-based surface decomposition and antibody-specific features are the most effective formulation for accurate scoring. Across multiple independent test sets, DeepRank-Ab consistently outperforms all evaluated methods, including AlphaFold3, HADDOCK and state-of-the-art scoring functions. It increases AlphaFold3 Top1 success rate by 35.5% and improves the mean Top1 DockQ by more than a factor of two. DeepRank-Ab generalizes beyond its training distribution, achieving 100% Top5 success rate on external antibody-antigen CAPRI targets, surpassing all tested methods. These results establish DeepRank-Ab as effective scoring method substantially improving identification of near-native antibody-antigen conformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.