ArticleScientific reports2026
Fault tolerance in para-line network topologies: theory and applications in smart systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores the fault-tolerant metric dimension (FTMD) of the para-line network, which is derived from the n-sunlet network, a significant category of networks created by subdividing and transforming cycle-based networks to simulate greater structural complexity. FTMD ensures robust vertex identification even when some nodes fail, a characteristic essential for fault-resilient systems like communication and sensor networks. By rigorously analyzing the structural attributes of these para-line networks, we demonstrate that the FTMD consistently behaves in a specific manner: it is equal to 3 when [Formula: see text] or 6, and 4 otherwise. Our approach includes constructive distance-vector analysis and combinatorial proofs to ensure the smallest possible size of the fault-tolerant resolving set (FTRS). These findings contribute both theoretically and practically, offering new perspectives on the development of resilient network topologies for practical applications such as IoT infrastructure, smart cities, and fault-tolerant distributed systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.