ArticleScientific reports2026
The role of interpersonal trust in public acceptance of AI-driven recruitment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As artificial intelligence (AI) technology expands into decision-making domains such as recruitment, concerns over fairness, transparency, and public trust have emerged. This study examines public acceptance of AI in high-risk applications, focusing on AI-driven recruitment processes. Using secondary data analysis and a survey of the Korean public, the research explores factors influencing AI acceptability. The findings reveal that trust in humans plays a critical role in shaping attitudes toward AI. Individuals with lower interpersonal trust are more likely to accept AI, as they perceive it to be a fairer alternative to human decision-makers, who may be influenced by bias. Cross-national analysis further supports this pattern, showing that countries with lower interpersonal trust exhibit higher trust in AI. Hierarchical regression analysis confirms that trust in AI technology itself is the strongest predictor of its acceptance, while distrust in human recruiters significantly increases the likelihood of preferring AI-driven hiring. These findings highlight the complex relationship between human trust, AI acceptance, and perceptions of fairness. As AI continues to be integrated into decision-making, ensuring transparency and addressing algorithmic bias will be crucial. Future research should explore how interpersonal trust influences AI adoption across different cultural and regulatory contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.