ArticleScientific reports2026
Effects of size and atomic defects on the buckling of single-layer and double-layer graphene nanoplates using AFEM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of single atomic vacancy defects with different random distributions on the buckling behavior of single- and double-layer graphene nanoplates. A parametric analysis was conducted to assess the influence of nanoplate dimensions, aspect ratio, defect concentration, number of layers, and boundary conditions on the critical buckling load ([Formula: see text]). To capture the discrete nature of graphene, the nanoplates were modeled using a space frame approach, where covalent bonds between carbon atoms were represented as beam elements and interlayer van der Waals forces were simulated using linear elastic springs. The atomic positions were generated using MATLAB and imported into ANSYS, where neighboring atoms were connected based on an energy-equivalent mapping between interatomic and elastic beam energies. Springs were added between atoms located within a defined cutoff distance to represent long-range interlayer interactions. A linear finite element buckling analysis was performed by solving an eigenvalue problem using beam and spring elements with linear elastic behavior. Model validation was achieved by comparing simulation results to data available in the literature. The results show that vacancy defects significantly reduce [Formula: see text]-up to 40% at 10% defect concentration. Furthermore, three distinct distributions of defects were examined for each concentration to explore spatial effects on buckling resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.