ArticleScientific reports2026
A 19-layer convolutional neural network for accurate COVID-19 detection in chest X-ray images: comparative analysis with pretrained networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most conspicuous developments in the unprecedented worldwide epidemic of COVID-19 is the pressing demand for reliable diagnostic tools. Utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) and image processing algorithms, this work proposes a novel 19-layer Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for accurate COVID-19 detection from chest X-ray images. This CNN architecture supports structure with single/multiple labels for three classes (i.e., for classification between layers like viral pneumonia, normal, and COVID-19) and four classes (i.e., lung opacity, normal, COVID-19, and pneumonia). Across the accuracy, specificity, precision, sensitivity, confusion matrix, F1-score, and other metrics, our model was compared to periutils net from the literature such as popular pre-trained networks(Inception, AlexNet, ResNet50, SqueezeNet, VGG19). Experimental results show that the proposed CNN outperforms existing methods, providing an effective diagnostic tool with the potential for clinical usage. This means AI algorithms as advanced as Cogito could start making decisions about COVID-19 and inform clinicians about how to handle the case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.