ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-scale mechanistic evaluation of reactivity balance in metakaolin-nano-CaCO
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study introduces a multiscale framework for optimizing the metakaolin-nano-CaCO3 (MK–NC) system for enhanced clay stabilization. While previous studies have typically investigated MK or nano-CaCO3 independently and often without a systematic factorial matrix or integrated environmental assessment, the interactive mechanisms governing their coupled performance remain insufficiently clarified. In particular, the absence of full compositional mapping and multi-scale correlation between geotechnical behavior, microstructure, and sustainability metrics has limited mechanistic understanding of synergy domains. Using a comprehensive 4 × 4 factorial design with varying MK (1–10 wt%) and NC (0.1-1.0 wt%) concentrations, we evaluated the effects on plasticity, compaction, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and consolidation, alongside microstructural and mineralogical analysis via SEM/EDS and XRD. The findings reveal that an optimal MK-NC formulation (about 4 wt% MK + 0.1 wt% NC) significantly improves soil properties, with a 30% reduction in plasticity index, a 2–3% increase in optimum moisture content, and a 250% enhancement in 28-day strength. Consolidation characteristics also improve, indicating a denser, faster-draining microstructure. Furthermore, a cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment (functional unit: 1 kg of material), incorporating the modeled energy requirements for metakaolin calcination and nano-CaCO₃ processing, indicates that the selected C-N1-M40 binder achieves an estimated 68% reduction in Global Warming Potential (GWP) relative to OPC under the defined system boundaries. These results position the MK-NC system as a mechanistically optimized and environmentally promising alternative for high-performance clay stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.