ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy using an ultra-thin endoscope for local failure with esophageal stenosis after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) is a salvage endoscopic treatment option for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). PDT is usually performed using ordinary-sized conventional endoscopes (CEs); however, some patients with local failure have esophageal stenosis caused by chemoradiotherapy or endoscopic resection. In such cases, an ultra-thin endoscope (UTE) is sometimes used, but the efficacy and safety of PDT performed with UTEs (UTE-PDT) remain unclear. In this study, we compared the treatment outcomes of UTE-PDT with those of PDT using CEs (CE-PDT).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent talaporfin sodium-based PDT for histologically confirmed local ESCC failure between October 2015 and June 2022. Short-term outcomes, including the local complete response (L-CR) rate and adverse events, were compared between UTE-PDT and CE-PDT.
resultsIn total, eight patients underwent UTE-PDT and 81 underwent CE-PDT. L-CR rates were 50.0% and 59.3% for the UTE-PDT and CE-PDT groups, respectively. The L-CR rates for lesions ≤ 20 mm were 50.0% (4/8) and 63.4% (45/71) in the UTE-PDT and CE-PDT groups, and for cT1 lesions, they were 57.1% (4/7) and 63.2% (43/68), respectively. Adverse events included esophageal pain (12.5% and 39.5%) and esophageal stenosis (12.5% and 4.9%) in the UTE-PDT and CE-PDT groups, respectively; however, all were grade ≤ 2.
conclusionsUTE-PDT for local failure after chemoradiotherapy for ESCC showed short-term outcomes that did not differ substantially from those of CE-PDT and may represent a potential therapeutic option for patients with no alternative treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42230512What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.