Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230511›Full record

ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026

Optimizing lymph node dissection for accurate nodal staging in early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Seong Yong Park, Boram Park, Jae Kwang Yun, Hyeong Ryul Kim, Yong-Hee Kim, Yeong Jeong Jeon, Junghee Lee, Jong Ho Cho, Hong Kwan Kim, Yong Soo Choi and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seong Yong Park *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Boram Park *College of Medicine, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Jae Kwang Yun *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Hyeong Ryul KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. drhrkim10@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-0616
Yong-Hee KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
Yeong Jeong JeonDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junghee LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Ho ChoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hong Kwan KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Soo ChoiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Il ZoDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Mog ShimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Republic of Korea National Red Cross RS-2025-00553825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo confirm the accurate pN0 status in patients with cT1-2N0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and recommend an optimal lymph node (LN) count for accurate nodal staging.

methodsA total of 1855 patients who underwent upfront surgery for cT1-2N0 ESCC at two tertiary academic hospitals in Korea between 1995 and 2019 were included. The probability of false-negative lymphadenectomy and the Nodal Staging Score (NSS) were calculated to assess adequate staging.

resultsThe mean age was 63.4 ± 8.0 years, with 93.1% male patients. The mean number of dissected LNs was 34.7 ± 14.0. The clinical T stages were cTis and cT1a 354 (19.1%), cT1b 1,053 (56.8%), and cT2 448 (24.2%). Pathological nodal upstaging occurred in 448 (24.2%) patients, with 337 (18.2%) pN1, 94 (5.1%) pN2, and 17 (0.9%) pN3. The analysis indicated that removing fewer than 33 LNs was associated with a 20% risk of missing metastatic nodes, whereas dissecting 53 nodes reduced this risk to 10%. Although overall survival improved with an increasing number of dissected LNs, the benefits plateaued beyond 33 LNs. The NSS, which indicates the likelihood that a patient with pN0 truly has no occult nodal disease, increased with the number of LNs dissected.

conclusionsWe recommend extensive dissection of at least 33 LNs during esophagectomy for accurate staging and to minimize the risk of undetected positive LNs in early-stage ESCC.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaLymph Node ExcisionAgedEsophagectomyFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRepublic of KoreaRetrospective StudiesEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaLymphadenectomyNodal stagingSurvival analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.