ReviewHormones (Athens, Greece)2026
Multi-omics insights into metastatic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Mechanisms, signatures, and prediction models.
Review in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs), rare neuroendocrine tumors, have been generally considered, since the 2017 WHO classification, as malignant neoplasms with various metastatic potential. Approximately 10-25% of PPGLs will develop metastases, with a varying 5-year-overall-survial of 40%-77%. Previous studies have extensively elucidated the mechanisms by which SDHB mutations promote tumor metastasis through inducing the pseudohypoxic and hypermethylation phenotype. Recent multi-omics studies further profiled the additional landscape of metastatic PPGLs, involving ATRX/TERT alterations, higher tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability score, and somatic copy-number alteration, distinct microRNA (miRNA) profiling, aberrant kynurenine metabolic pathway, and immunosuppressive microenvironment, advancing our understanding of metastatic mechanisms. Consequently, beyond conventional predictors (e.g., SDHB mutation status, tumor size and location, levels of dopamine and methoxytyramine, Ki-67 labeling index, and loss of S100), emerging biomarkers for metastasis prediction were discovered and evaluated, including levels of circulating miR-483-5p, plasma succinate, tissue xanthurenic acid, and CDK1 expression, etc. Several scoring systems integrating tumor clinicopathological characteristics have been constructed to predict metastatic PPGLs; however, their clinical utility may be limited by high observer variation and low positive predictive value. Recent prediction models integrating multi-omics signatures of metastatic tumors have also been established, but without validation. This review comprehensively synthesizes current and emerging multi-omics signatures of metastatic PPGLs to elucidate underlying metastatic mechanisms. A systematic review of existing scoring systems and emerging predictive models for metastasis prediction was also conducted to highlight their advantages and limitations in the clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42230482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.