Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230437›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

The fundamentals of eye tracking, Part 7: Determining data quality.

Diederick C Niehorster, Marcus Nyström, Roy S Hessels, Jeroen S Benjamins, Richard Andersson, Ignace T C Hooge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diederick C NiehorsterLund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. diederick_c.niehorster@humlab.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4672-8756
Marcus NyströmLund University Humanities Lab, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Roy S HesselsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen S BenjaminsExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard AnderssonTobii AB, Danderyd, Sweden.
Ignace T C HoogeExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the quality of eye-tracking recordings, often characterized using accuracy, precision, and data loss, is crucial for the interpretation of eye tracking data. Eye-tracking data quality can furthermore place fundamental limits on what studies can be conducted with an eye tracker, and one may be required to report eye-tracking data quality when publishing a study. However, how does one determine the quality of eye-tracking data? This article provides an overview of operationalizations of accuracy, precision, and data loss and practical advice for determining eye-tracking data quality. Furthermore, the programming code for calculating various quality metrics for a segment of eye-tracking data is provided in MATLAB, Python, and R. Also provided is ETDQualitizer, a tool designed to enable anyone to easily determine the data quality of their recordings. We provide a version that is browser-based ( https://dcnieho.github.io/ETDQualitizer ) and enables determining eye-tracking data quality without installation or programming, while ensuring data privacy by running entirely locally. ETDQualitizer is further provided as a MATLAB, Python, and R library ( https://github.com/dcnieho/ETDQualitizer ) that can be integrated in one's analysis scripts. We hope that this article enables any researcher to determine, critically evaluate, and report on eye-tracking data quality, and that it spurs researchers to adopt a data quality perspective in all their future eye-tracking studies.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyEye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansSoftwareAccuracyData lossData qualityEye trackingPrecisionSoftwareToolsValidation

Identifiers

PMID42230437
PMCPMC13230380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.