ArticleOdontology2026
Schneiderian membrane thickening and its association with apical periodontitis: a cone-beam computed tomography analysis.
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the presence of apical periodontitis (AP) and its association with characteristics of the Schneiderian membrane (SM) in cone-beam computed tomography images. The initial sample consisted of 516 tomographic scans comprising 1,032 maxillary sinuses (MS). After applying the eligibility criteria, 142 examinations and 197 MS images were included. Images were evaluated and measured using RadiAnt DICOM viewer software, and each MS was analyzed individually. Parameters assessed included the endodontic status of teeth (treated vs. non-treated), the presence of AP, the root location of the AP, cortical disruption, and SM thickness. Membrane thickness was categorized as normal (< 3 mm) or pathological (≥ 3 mm). Data were compiled in Microsoft Excel and subsequently exported to SPSS for analysis. Contingency tables were constructed for variables associated with membrane thickening, and either the Chi-square test for independence or Fisher's exact test was applied. The significance threshold was set at 5%. Schneiderian membrane thickening was observed in 43.1% of the 142 examinations. Thickening was more common on the left side (47.9%) and in cases involving a single endodontically treated tooth (44.4%). Prevalence was higher in males (47.8%) and in individuals aged 40-49 years. A significant and positive association was found between SM thickening and both endodontic treatment and the presence of AP (p = 0.014). Schneiderian membrane thickening is significantly associated with the presence of AP and with the combined presence of endodontic treatment and AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42230425What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.