ReviewJournal of clinical immunology2026
Clinical Cognition and Practice in Anti-Interferon-γ Autoantibody-Associated Immunodeficiency Syndrome.
Review in Journal of clinical immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adult-onset immunodeficiency syndrome mediated by anti-interferon-gamma autoantibody (AIGA) is a rare disorder that has garnered increasing recognition in recent years. The condition is most prevalent among adults in Southeast Asia. It is characterized by recurrent disseminated opportunistic infections, frequently involving multiple organ systems such as the lungs, lymph nodes, bones, and skin. The pathogenesis is primarily attributed to the presence of neutralizing AIGAs, which impair the IFN-γ-mediated JAK-STAT1 signaling pathway, leading to compromised host defense against intracellular pathogens. Laboratory diagnosis requires both quantification of AIGA titers and assessment of their neutralizing activity. Clinical diagnosis relies on a combination of characteristic manifestations, demonstrated immunologic dysfunction, and seropositivity for AIGAs. During the acute stage, management focuses on antimicrobial therapy, while during the stable stage, it can be categorized into three clinical subtypes: high AIGA titers with immune damage, high AIGA titers without immune damage, and low AIGA titers without immune damage. Among these, patients with high AIGA titers and immune damage require immunomodulatory strategies-such as glucocorticoids and rituximab-tailored to individual AIGA levels and immune status. Due to the current absence of unified clinical guidelines, this review synthesizes available evidence and clinical expertise to provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and treatment approaches related to AIGA-mediated immunodeficiency. Our aim is to assist clinicians in the recognition and management of this syndrome and to facilitate further clinical research and guideline development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.