ArticleJournal of neurology2026
Serum neurofilaments for motoneuron and dementia diseases: a German multicenter cohort study.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSerum neurofilament light and heavy chains (sNfL and sNfH) have been assessed as neuronal markers for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and dementias. Whereas sNfL has robust literature, systematic studies on sNfH are lacking. Here, we aimed to assess the diagnostic value of sNfH in comparison to sNfL in a broad range of neurodegenerative disorders.
methodsWe measured with immunoassays sNfH and sNfL in patients recruited in the multicenter German Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) Consortium (n = 340) and in a single-center German cohort (n = 290). We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of serum biomarkers for ALS and dementia subtypes and their relationship with cognitive impairment.
resultssNfH and sNfL were significantly increased in ALS (n = 90) vs. controls (n = 109) and ALS mimics (n = 56, p < 0.001), with sNfL showing higher discriminative accuracy (AUC = 0.94-0.95) than sNfH (AUC = 0.87-0.88). sNfH/sNfL ratio did not improve the diagnostic performance. Both markers were elevated in patients with dementia (n = 289) vs. controls (p < 0.001). sNfL was higher in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) than in Alzheimer's disease (AD), whereas sNfH was similar in AD, PPA and bvFTD. sNfL, but not sNfH, was correlated with cognitive impairment at baseline and cognitive decline at follow-up in AD and bvFTD.
conclusionssNfH and sNfL are elevated in motoneuron and dementia disorders. sNfH showed good discriminative accuracy for ALS, which was slightly lower than that of sNfL. sNfL, but not sNfH, showed prognostic value for assessing cognitive decline in dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.