Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230360›Full record

SynthesisChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026

What is the best surgical approach for Pineal Region Tumors? A systematic literature review and anatomical comparative study.

Davide Palombi, Ludovico Agostini, Riccardo Maria Brancaleone, Martina Offi, Edoardo Agosti, Simona Serioli, Barbara Buffoli, Rita Rezzani, Pierpaolo Mattogno, Lena Hirtler and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Davide PalombiDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy. davidepalombi@hotmail.it.
Ludovico AgostiniDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo Maria BrancaleoneDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Martina OffiDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo AgostiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Simona SerioliDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Barbara BuffoliSection of Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Rita RezzaniSection of Anatomy and Physiopathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Pierpaolo MattognoDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Lena HirtlerDivision of Anatomy, Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Marco Maria FontanellaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Neurosurgery Unit, University of Brescia, 25123, Brescia, Italy.
Luca MassimiDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro OliviDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Francesco DogliettoDepartment of Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Gianpiero TamburriniDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePineal region tumors pose significant surgical challenges due to their deep location and proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Despite multiple described techniques, no consensus exists on the optimal surgical approach, with the supracerebellar infratentorial (SCIT) and occipital interhemispheric transtentorial (OITA) approaches representing the most adopted corridors.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted to evaluate surgical approaches for pineal region tumors and their associated complication profiles. In addition, anatomical dissections combined with a tumor simulation technique were used as illustrative tools to compare exposure patterns obtained through SCIT, SCIT with tentorial incision (SCIT + T), and OITA approaches.

resultsThe systematic review, comprising 27 studies and 1774 patients, identified OITA (42.21%) and SCIT (38.27%) as the most frequently employed approaches. SCIT was more commonly associated with cerebellar complications, cerebrospinal fluid leaks, meningitis, and Parinaud's syndrome (p < 0.005), whereas OITA was associated with a higher incidence of homonymous hemianopia (p = 0.0011). From an anatomical perspective, infratentorial approaches provided broader exposure of the inferior quadrants (Q1, Q2), while OITA offered greater visualization of the superior ipsilateral quadrant (Q3). The addition of a tentorial incision to SCIT facilitated visualization of supratentorial quadrants (Q3, Q4), which are otherwise less accessible through the standard infratentorial corridor. Tumor simulations further illustrated that approach selection is influenced by the tumor's relationship to the deep venous system, with supratentorial routes favoring lesions anterior to the veins and infratentorial corridors favoring posterior extension.

conclusionsSelection between SCIT and OITA should be individualized based on tumor characteristics, venous relationships, and tentorial anatomy. Tentorial incision may expand the versatility of SCIT in selected cases.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeurosurgical ProceduresPineal GlandPinealomaHumansPineal glandPineal region tumorsSurgical approaches

Identifiers

PMID42230360
PMCPMC13230278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.