Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230351›Full record

ReviewCurrent microbiology2026

Gut Microbiota and Autoimmune Diseases: The Therapeutic Potential of Probiotics.

Angelika Domagała, Aneta Kiecka

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angelika DomagałaCentre of Microbiological Research, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6067-1074
Aneta KieckaCentre of Microbiological Research, Kraków, Poland. aneta.kiecka@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-8972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward the role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes (T1D), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Numerous studies have shown that gut dysbiosis-an imbalance in the intestinal microbial community-can influence host immune responses by modulating inflammatory pathways, gut barrier integrity, and immune cell function. Patients with T1D, RA, and MS often exhibit a decreased abundance of anti-inflammatory bacteria (e.g., Faecalibacterium prausnitzii) and an overrepresentation of pro-inflammatory taxa (e.g., Prevotella copri). Probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation have shown therapeutic potential by restoring microbial balance, enhancing short-chain fatty acid production, supporting regulatory T cell function, and suppressing pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 responses. Despite promising results, the efficacy and safety of these interventions remain uncertain, especially in immunocompromised individuals. The lack of standardization in probiotic formulations, limited large-scale clinical trials, and unknown long-term effects restrict their widespread application. Moreover, individual variability in microbiota composition and disease phenotype complicates the development of universally effective treatments. Further rigorous research is necessary to better understand the immunological mechanisms involved and to develop safe, personalized, and effective microbiota-based therapeutic strategies. Until then, probiotics and FMT should be considered as adjunctive therapies within comprehensive treatment plans for autoimmune diseases rather than standalone solutions.

Indexed as

Autoimmune DiseasesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsDysbiosisFecal Microbiota TransplantationHumans

Identifiers

PMID42230351
PMCPMC13230289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.