Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42230320›Full record

ReviewMacromolecular rapid communications2026

Biofunctional Surface Modification of Polymeric Implants for Biomedical Applications.

Ritika Tripathi, M Sudhakara Reddy, Suchitra Rajput

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ritika TripathiCentre for Advanced Materials and Devices (CAMD), School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
M Sudhakara ReddyDepartment of Biotechnology, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9743-4993
Suchitra RajputCentre for Advanced Materials and Devices (CAMD), School of Engineering and Technology, BML Munjal University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The engineering of the polymer biological interface remains a challenge as it governs responses, such as protein adsorption, cell adhesion, and bacterial colonization, thereby maintaining long-term biocompatibility. Although polymers are widely used in biomedical implants, the challenges of pristine surfaces in directly interacting with complex physiological environments remain a major challenge. Surface modification is therefore essential for tailoring polymer interfaces to achieve optimal biological and functional performance. This review provides a comprehensive overview of polymeric materials employed in biomedical implants and the surface modification strategies used to enhance their performance. Both biodegradable and non-biodegradable polymers are discussed, with emphasis on approaches that enhance surface hydrophilicity, mechanical integrity, and interfacial bioactivity while imparting antibacterial, antifouling, and antithrombogenic properties.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersProstheses and ImplantsHumansHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsSurface PropertiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsPolymersantibacterial coatingantifouling coatingbiofilm inhibitionbiofoulingcoatingimplant coatingmaterials sciencesurface modification

Identifiers

PMID42230320
PMCPMC13435010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.