ArticleGenome research2026
Transfer learning enhances clinical utility of polygenic scores with small, phenotypically refined cohorts.
Article in Genome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Diagnosis in Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Management.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical utility of PRS may be hindered by reliance on large, heterogeneous data sets for generation that dilute phenotypic specificity. Meanwhile, small, well-defined clinical cohorts (target) are ubiquitous but insufficient for PRS development. We propose an external-PRS (ePRS) framework borrowing from the transfer learning literature that integrates genetic evidence from target cohorts, incorporating continuous evidence measures and genetic correlation for robust predictions. Simulation indicates superior performance of ePRS across varying genetic correlations between the source and target phenotypes. ePRS refines an idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) PRS to improve differentiation between juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) and other IGE subtypes and, leveraging a large attention deficit hyperactivity disorder GWAS, enhances predictions for impulsivity in JME. Finally, to address concerns about potential cross-platform artifacts, we train and evaluate ePRS in the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Gene Modifier Study cohort to predict CF-related diabetes using UK Biobank type 2 diabetes (T2D) summary statistics as the external source phenotype. ePRS continues to improve prediction accuracy in this single-cohort, harmonized-QC setting and offers more precise risk stratification and personalized care across complex traits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.