ArticleBMJ open2026
Repeated versus selective tactile stimulation for preterm infants at birth: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (NEU-stim trial).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05942924 (A Randomised Trial of Repetitive Versus Selective Tactile Stimulation for Preterm Infants at Birth), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Trial of Repetitive Versus Selective Tactile Stimulation for Preterm Infants at Birth: The NEU-STIM Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPreterm infants frequently receive support for inadequate breathing at birth. Though current guidelines recommend using tactile stimulation to promote breathing, guidance on its use is limited. There are few studies on the effects of tactile stimulation with a high risk of bias in these studies. We aim to generate robust evidence by comparing the effects of repeated to selective tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth in a stepped-wedge cluster randomised study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial is being conducted from 11 March 2024 in 43 centres across Europe. All centres begin in the selective stimulation (control) arm, where stimulation is applied only when breathing effort is judged inadequate by treating clinicians. Every fortnight, one centre switches to the repeated stimulation (intervention) arm, where stimulation is provided for 10 s, alternated with 10-second pauses for at least the first 5 min after birth. Once centres switch, they continue in the repeated stimulation arm until study completion. The order of switching is prospectively and randomly assigned, with the last switch occurring on 24 November 2025. The primary outcome is achievement of a pre-ductal oxygen saturation ≥80% at 5 min after birth. Analyses will use generalised linear mixed models to compare outcomes between groups at the individual level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained at all participating centres. The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the General Data Protection Regulation. Results will be shared with investigators, published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05942924.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.