Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42229963›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Repeated versus selective tactile stimulation for preterm infants at birth: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (NEU-stim trial).

Janneke Dekker, Colm P F O'Donnell, Mario Rüdiger, Arjan B Te Pas, Steffen C Pauws

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05942924 (A Randomised Trial of Repetitive Versus Selective Tactile Stimulation for Preterm Infants at Birth), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05942924 narecruitingnot on this map

A Randomised Trial of Repetitive Versus Selective Tactile Stimulation for Preterm Infants at Birth: The NEU-STIM Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled3,280ConditionsInfant, Premature, Diseases, Birth, PretermArmsRepeated tactile stimulation, Selective tactile stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janneke DekkerWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands j.dekker@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-3587
Colm P F O'DonnellSchool of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Mario RüdigerDepartment for Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Technische Universitat Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Arjan B Te PasWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Steffen C PauwsDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreterm infants frequently receive support for inadequate breathing at birth. Though current guidelines recommend using tactile stimulation to promote breathing, guidance on its use is limited. There are few studies on the effects of tactile stimulation with a high risk of bias in these studies. We aim to generate robust evidence by comparing the effects of repeated to selective tactile stimulation of preterm infants at birth in a stepped-wedge cluster randomised study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial is being conducted from 11 March 2024 in 43 centres across Europe. All centres begin in the selective stimulation (control) arm, where stimulation is applied only when breathing effort is judged inadequate by treating clinicians. Every fortnight, one centre switches to the repeated stimulation (intervention) arm, where stimulation is provided for 10 s, alternated with 10-second pauses for at least the first 5 min after birth. Once centres switch, they continue in the repeated stimulation arm until study completion. The order of switching is prospectively and randomly assigned, with the last switch occurring on 24 November 2025. The primary outcome is achievement of a pre-ductal oxygen saturation ≥80% at 5 min after birth. Analyses will use generalised linear mixed models to compare outcomes between groups at the individual level. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained at all participating centres. The study adheres to the Declaration of Helsinki, the principles of Good Clinical Practice and the General Data Protection Regulation. Results will be shared with investigators, published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05942924.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematurePhysical StimulationEuropeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCardiopulmonary ResuscitationInfantNEONATOLOGYRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID42229963
PMCPMC13239611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.