ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2026
The Study of Adsorption Effects on Taylor Dispersion Analysis of Proteins.
Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the present work, we investigated protein adsorption in fused silica capillaries under typical Taylor dispersion analysis (TDA) conditions, including standard sample volumes, concentrations, flow parameters, and capillary dimensions. To reduce protein adsorption, the bare fused silica surface-containing deprotonated SiOH groups-was briefly washed with the analyte protein to form a dynamic but quite stable precoating. The subsequently injected protein peaks exhibited good reproducibility. The advantage of the present method is that the background signal does not interfere with the analytical response of the sample, resulting in improved detection sensitivity. Furthermore, for certain detectors (e.g., MS), the continuous introduction of a protein solution-even at low concentration-can be avoided. Although peak tailing did not disappear completely, the peak asymmetry measured at 50% peak height was better than 0.9 for neutral and acidic proteins. To minimize the effects on the results caused by adsorption-induced peak broadening in the resulting taylorgrams, the peak width (peak variance) used for diffusion coefficient determination was taken as twice the front half-width at 50% peak height.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.