ArticleOphthalmology. Retina2026
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Incidence.
Article in Ophthalmology. Retina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obesity and Eye Diseases.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) use and the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and neovascular AMD (nAMD) among adults with diabetes.
designRetrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study.
participantsAdults with diabetes who initiated a GLP-1RA or another noninsulin antidiabetic agent. In Epic Cosmos, 2 797 686 GLP-1RA users were matched 1:1 to 2 797 686 active comparators.
methodsWe analyzed de-identified electronic health record data from Epic Cosmos and independently replicated the primary analyses in the University of California Health Data Warehouse. Individuals with prevalent AMD or nAMD and those with prior anti-VEGF treatment were excluded. One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching balanced demographics, diabetes duration, comorbidities, smoking, diabetic retinopathy, obesity, and eye-care utilization. Cumulative incidence at 1, 5, and 10 years was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods, and adjusted associations were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models.
main outcome measuresIncidence of any AMD and nAMD.
resultsIn the matched Epic Cosmos cohort (total N = 5 595 372), GLP-1RA use was associated with lower cumulative incidence of any AMD at 1 year (0.187% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.182%-0.192%] vs. 0.294% [95% CI, 0.287%-0.301%]), 5 years (0.924% [95% CI, 0.907%-0.941%] vs. 1.278% [95% CI, 1.260%-1.296%]), and 10 years (5.561% [95% CI, 4.719%-6.549%] vs. 6.540% [95% CI, 6.017%-7.108%]); all P < 0.001. Unadjusted cumulative incidence of nAMD was also lower among GLP-1RA users at 1 year (0.047% vs. 0.065%), 5 years (0.280% vs. 0.340%), and 10 years (1.874% vs. 2.393%); all P < 0.001. In multivariable Cox models, GLP-1RA use was independently associated with lower hazard of any AMD (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.83-0.86; P < 0.001) and was not associated with an increased hazard of nAMD (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.04; P = 0.79). In the independent University of California Health Data Warehouse cohort, GLP-1RA use was likewise associated with lower AMD incidence at 5 and 10 years, whereas nAMD incidence did not differ significantly between groups.
conclusionsAmong adults with diabetes, GLP-1RA use was associated with lower incident AMD and was not associated with increased nAMD risk. These findings provide reassurance regarding ocular safety and support a potential protective association for earlier AMD phenotypes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.