Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2026
Final outcomes of the SOFT and TEXT phase III trials in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer.
Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT) found adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to tamoxifen (T) reduced breast cancer recurrence, and exemestane (E)+OFS further reduced recurrence. A combined analysis of SOFT and TEXT showed a significant reduction in distant recurrence with E+OFS versus T+OFS. We now report final 15-year outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsPremenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer were enrolled, with 3047 in SOFT and 2660 in TEXT intention-to-treat populations. SOFT randomized to 5 years of T versus T+OFS versus E+OFS. TEXT randomized to 5 years of T+OFS versus E+OFS. Chemotherapy was optional, before SOFT entry with subsequent premenopausal oestradiol or concurrent with OFS in TEXT. Endpoints included disease-free survival, breast cancer-free interval (BCFI), distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), and overall survival (OS). Additionally, 15-year Kaplan-Meier estimates, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported.
resultsIn SOFT, escalating endocrine therapy (ET) continued to reduce recurrence with 15-year BCFI of 78.6% for E+OFS, 75.7% for T+OFS, and 72.1% for T (T+OFS versus T: HR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.69-0.98, P = 0.03). In the SOFT no-chemotherapy cohort, OFS reduced breast cancer events at 15 years, while DRFI and OS remained high regardless of ET assignment. After prior chemotherapy for HER2-negative tumors (n = 1257), the 15-year OS rate in SOFT was 81.0% with E+OFS, 77.1% with T+OFS and 76.8% with tamoxifen alone. In women under age 35 years with HER2-negative tumors (n = 241), the 15-year OS rate was 82.5% with E+OFS, 77.9% with T+OFS, and 68.1% with tamoxifen. In combined SOFT and TEXT analysis, among those with HER2-negative tumors (n = 4035), E+OFS versus T+OFS reduced distant recurrence (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90), with a smaller reduction in deaths (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74-1.06), with absolute survival benefits largest with high-risk features, particularly young age or high-grade tumors.
conclusionMeaningful OS benefit in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer from adjuvant exemestane and/or OFS compared with tamoxifen alone is limited to high-risk premenopausal subgroups. Tamoxifen-based ET may not result in optimal outcomes in premenopausal high-grade HER2-negative tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.