ArticleSouthern medical journal2026
Trends in Reported End-of-Life Concerns after the Legalization of Physician-Assisted Suicide.
Article in Southern medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesUnderstanding the concerns that motivate requests for assisted dying (euthanasia or assisted suicide) is essential for understanding these practices. Our objective was to determine whether there are significant trends in end-of-life concerns cited in requests for physician-assisted suicide (PAS) in Oregon and Washington.
methodsWe estimated regressions using data on reported end-of-life concerns (autonomy, enjoyment, dignity, control, burden, pain, and finance) taken from annual state reports and which covered 6853 deaths. We pooled the data for our two states and estimated the trend for each end-of-life concern. We added controls for demographic variables, separated time trends for each state, and added other tests for robustness.
resultsOur estimates suggested no significant trend for autonomy or enjoyment. The common trend was negative and statistically significant for dignity and control, but control was not significant for Washington. Trends were significantly positive for burden, pain, and finance, but finance was not significant for Washington.
conclusionsThere have been significant trends in reported end-of-life concerns that motivate requests for PAS in Oregon and Washington. The increase in perceived burdensomeness as a motivation for PAS adds weight to the argument that changing the law can have an adverse effect on the self-perception of those who receive care. Qualitative research has identified adverse impacts of assisted dying on pain management. Our findings suggest a significant increase in concerns about inadequate pain control since the legalization of PAS. We found no evidence that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has reduced the proportion of people seeking death because of concerns about the cost of their care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.