ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Trends in acute specialist contacts following a primary care contact 2012-21-a registry-based study.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute patients in Norway can access specialist services through various pathways, with primary care services having a gatekeeping role. Although national data show declining acute specialist contacts, some emergency departments report increasing visits. This study examined national trends in acute specialist contacts following primary care visits.
methodsThis registry-based cohort study included all Norwegian citizens from 2012 to 2021. We obtained information on patients' contact with primary care (general practitioner (GP) service and out-of-hours service) before an acute specialist contact. Acute specialist contacts occuring within 10 h of a primary care contact were considered referrals. Incidence rates were estimated using Poisson regression.
resultsAmong 12.2 million acute specialist contacts, 21.8% had a preceding out-of-hours service contact, 19.2% had a preceding GP service contact, and 58.9% had no prior primary care contact. From 2012 to 2021, the incidence rate of acute specialist contacts following a primary care contact increased by 18.5% (95% CI: 17.9-19.1), from 91.8 to 109.3 per 1,000 person-years. This trend was observed across all demographic groups, and for both admissions and outpatient visits. The increase was most pronounced for referrals following the out-of-hours service (46.6 to 59.3 per 1,000 person-years), while GP service referrals remained stable.
conclusionsAcute specialist contacts declined over time, while the proportion and incidence rate of those following a primary care contact increased, particularly following out-of-hours services. The consistent trend across demographic groups suggests that changes in healthcare organisation and service use, rather than population changes, are contributing to the observed trend.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.