ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Can Stuttering on Content Versus Function Words Predict Stuttering Persistence in Young Children?
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe widely cited shift from function to content word stuttering is based largely on cross-sectional studies using broad binary word-class distinctions, which may obscure group differences. This study tested whether the distribution of stuttering-like disfluencies (SLDs) by finer grained part-of-speech-defined grammatical categories and utterance position distinguishes children who persist in stuttering (CWSP) from those who recover (CWSR) and whether alternative measurement definitions offer insight beyond the traditional function/content dichotomy.
methodSpontaneous language samples were drawn from 57 children (12 CWSP, 45 CWSR) in the Illinois International Stuttering Research Project at three time points across 3 years postonset. SLDs were identified and analyzed by binary lexical class (content vs. function), part-of-speech-defined grammatical categories, and utterance position (initial, medial, final) using Computerized Language Analysis tools. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures analysis of variance, mixed-effects modeling, and Firth logistic regression.
resultsChildren stuttered more frequently on function words than content words across groups and time points. The combined influence of grammatical class and utterance position yielded the clearest differentiation between groups. Utterance-final disfluencies were more strongly associated with persistent stuttering, whereas variation in metric definition (tendency vs. occurrence) reflected different analytic perspectives without altering the overall pattern of results or differentiating recovery outcomes.
conclusionsWhile the content/function distinction captures general stuttering patterns in early childhood, it does not differentiate recovery status. Analyses incorporating utterance position and explicit measurement definitions reveal that fluency breakdowns are best understood as emerging from structural and positional pressures within the utterance rather than from categorical word-type effects. These findings highlight the value of moving beyond coarse word-class divisions to better characterize variability in early stuttering and to support more precise, linguistically informed models of fluency development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.