ArticleSurgery2026
Evaluating challenges care-partners and older adults confront after major elective surgery: A multimethods study.
Article in Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWith the advent of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways, older adults who undergo major elective surgery return home early in the postoperative period and rely more on care-partner support. Little has been done to assess current challenges that older patient/care-partner dyads experience after major elective surgery and to identify intervention targets to improve transitions home after surgery.
methodsThis multimethods study recruited 15 dyads of major elective surgery patients aged 65+ years from 3 surgical specialties and their care-partners (30 participants total). Demographic, quality of life, and caregiver burden surveys were completed. Each participant underwent a 1-on-1 interview exploring challenges, resources received, and communication experiences. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Interview data were analyzed deductively, mapping themes onto the 5Ms of the Geriatrics framework.
resultsWe enrolled 6 thoracic, 5 colorectal, and 4 orthopedic patients, along with their care-partners (n = 30). Most participants were female (67%) and educated (ie, college degree +, 57%). Zarit Burden Interview surveys suggested mild-moderate burden (9.3; standard deviation, 10.38) with thoracic care-partners reporting higher burden (14.33; standard deviation, 13.98). World Health Organization quality-of-life scores were also lower among thoracic surgery dyads. The range of when the interview occurred in relation to the surgery date was 1-5 months. Qualitative analysis revealed the need for emotional support, improved anticipatory guidance about expected recovery, and assistance with activities of daily living/independent activities of daily living and medication management.
conclusionOlder surgical patients and their care-partners identified specific targets to improve transitions out of the hospital during surgical recovery, including enhanced communication, education, and emotional/physical support. Surgical teams, researchers, and health care system leaders can use these findings to improve care quality and support care-partners assisting older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.