ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2026
The effects of electrode configuration and location on motor thresholds, tolerance, and muscle selectivity of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in stroke.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying optimal conditions for transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), such as electrode configuration, is essential for clinical translation, particularly as this promising neuromodulation therapy expands to include diverse neurological populations. However, before clinical application, it is important to understand how different configurations affect dosage and muscle recruitment. We define dosage as the percentage of the current needed to elicit a motor response (the resting motor threshold, or RMT) of the current value tolerated during walking when stimulation is delivered continuously. Another consideration is whether electrode configurations can selectively recruit specific muscles, potentially guiding tSCS protocols to prioritize the muscles most critical for functional improvement. This study tested five electrode configurations in individuals with chronic stroke: one round electrode at T11-T12 vertebrae, one round electrode at L1-L2, two separate round electrodes at T11-T12 and L1-L2 from separate current channels, two separate round electrodes at T11-T12 and L1-L2 from the same current channel, and a rectangular electrode spanning T11-T12 and L1-L2. No single electrode configuration clearly outperformed others in terms of tolerated dosage, with most supporting stimulation near 50% of RMT except the two-channel setup with separate current channels, which showed lower dosage (∼35% RMT). Additionally, muscle selectivity did not significantly differ across configurations. These findings inform stimulation dosage feasibility for future tSCS protocols using different electrode configurations and the need for future studies to evaluate whether current dosage levels are adequate to induce meaningful neuromodulation and clinical benefits in the stroke population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.