ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2026
COVID-19 Rebound in Nirmatrelvir Plus Ritonavir Treatment and Control Groups: Prospective Cohort Study.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Observation of COVID-19 rebound after nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir (NPR) has driven important questions surrounding one of the only direct-acting antiviral treatments for COVID-19. Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the epidemiology of COVID-19 rebound among COVID-19-positive outpatients in the United States who independently decided whether or not to take NPR. Methods: This prospective, decentralized observational cohort study was conducted from August 2022 through December 2023 and included frequent proctored COVID-19 rapid antigen tests and self-report symptom surveys for 15 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of viral and symptom rebound. Secondary outcomes included time to initial viral and symptom clearance, rebound probability among patients who cleared by day 15, and symptom frequency. Results: Of 917 consenting participants, 669 (73%) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis (n=443, 66% in the NPR group; n=226, 34% in the control group). The mean age was 46.1 (SD 12.9) years, 62.6% (n=419) of participants were female, and 49.2% (n=329) had at least one preexisting condition. Overall, 15-day cumulative incidence was higher in the NPR group than the control group for both viral (70/443, 15.8% vs 12/226, 5.3%) and symptom (73/443, 16.5% vs 19/226, 8.4%) rebound. Time to initial viral and symptom clearance was similar between groups, and among those who experienced clearance by day 15, the probability of viral rebound (NPR: 19.1%, 95% CI 15.1%-24.0% vs control: 7%, 95% CI 4.0%-12.6%; P<.001) and symptom rebound (NPR: 47.7%, 95% CI 36.1%-60.8% vs control: 16.9%, 95% CI 10.9%-25.7%; P<.001) was higher in the NPR group than the control group. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that while COVID-19 rebound occurs in both NPR-treated and untreated outpatients, the incidence is higher in the NPR group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.