Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228760›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A process-guided uncertainty-aware deep learning framework for reliable and interpretable industrial fault diagnosis.

Babar Hayat, Shabeer Ahmad, Muhammad Asfandyar Shahid, Adil Khan, Md Rajibul Islam, Md Shohel Sayeed, Yasir Ullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Babar HayatSchool of Information Engineering, Xi'an Eurasia University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7406-8424
Shabeer AhmadSchool of Electronic Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Muhammad Asfandyar ShahidSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Adil KhanSchool of Information Engineering, Xi'an Eurasia University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Md Rajibul IslamDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0565-6917
Md Shohel SayeedCentre for Intelligent Cloud Computing, CoE for Advanced Cloud, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Multimedia University, Bukit Beruang, Melaka, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-4870
Yasir UllahCentre for Wireless Technology, Faculty of AI and Engineering, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely fault detection is essential for safety, product quality, and energy efficiency in advanced industrial processes. However, many existing fault diagnosis methods insufficiently exploit process structure and sensor reliability, which limits their robustness and practical usefulness for process engineers. This study presents an improved framework SAU-PGA-CNN-BiLSTM that first couples Convolutional Neural Networks and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory layers to extract multivariate temporal dynamics and spatial correlations of the process data, secondly a process guided and sensor-aware attention mechanism is introduced which embeds process centrality, sequence level sensor reliability and uncertainty to the attention learning, to suppress unreliable channels and bias towards informative and stable sensors. In addition, Monte Carlo dropout with sensor prior-conditioning is used to provide calibrated confidence estimates that reflect both predictive uncertainty and sensor reliability. Finally, two lightweight sigmoid output heads perform fault detection and diagnosis combinedly, promoting mutual reinforcement between the tasks. Validated on the Tennessee Eastman Process benchmark, the proposed framework outperforms baselines model and achieves 93.6% multiclass diagnosis accuracy with 94.0% F1 score. After temperature scaling, the proposed model also demonstrates improved calibration compared with an otherwise identical model without sensor awareness, reducing negative log-likelihood from 0.197 to 0.182, Brier score from 0.101 to 0.095, and expected calibration error from 0.040 to 0.037. Attention visualizations further show that the model focuses on process-relevant and reliable sensors, supporting reliable industrial fault diagnosis.

Identifiers

PMID42228760
PMCPMC13229308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.