Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228747›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Healthcare providers' beliefs about the health effects of nicotine and electronic cigarettes.

Sarahrose Jonik, Daniel Berger, Shari Hrabovsky, Jonathan Foulds, Jessica Yingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarahrose JonikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Daniel BergerDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-7670
Shari HrabovskyPenn State University College of Nursing, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jonathan FouldsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2296-0726
Jessica YingstDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3028-668X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research has shown that a significant proportion of healthcare providers hold inaccurate beliefs about the direct health risks of nicotine. However, the extent to which these misconceptions impact beliefs about the health effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) remains unclear. This study examines the relationship between beliefs about nicotine and e-cigarettes among healthcare providers and trainees.

methodsA questionnaire was distributed via email and printed flyers to healthcare providers and medical trainees at an academic medical center. Participants rated their beliefs about the health effects of nicotine harms on a Likert scale for 3 statements: "Nicotine is the substance that... 1) makes people want to smoke, 2) causes most of the cancer related to tobacco 3) causes most cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with smoking." Participants were also asked, "Compared to smoking cigarettes, would you say that electronic cigarettes are..." (less harmful, just as harmful, more harmful). Means and frequencies were tabulated, and logistic regression identified variables associated with believing e-cigarettes to be less harmful than combustible cigarettes.

resultsParticipants (n = 598) were 75.8% female with a mean age of 36.4 years (SD = 13.3). The distribution was as follows: 38.7% (n = 232) were physicians, PAs, or NPs, 27.6% (n = 165) were students, 24.4% (n = 146) were RNs, and 9.2% (n = 55) were RTs. Although 91.5% correctly identified nicotine as the chemical that makes people want to smoke, 25.9% and 42.8% incorrectly believed nicotine is the cause of cancer and CVD associated with cigarette smoking, respectively. Only 21.4% identified e-cigarettes as less harmful than cigarettes. Those believing e-cigarettes to be less harmful than combustible cigarettes were more likely to be male (OR=2.11, 95% CI 1.32-3.37), a student (OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.20-2.94), and to disagree that nicotine is the main substance that causes cancer (OR=1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88) or CVD (OR=1.62, 95% CI 1.23-2.13).

conclusionsInaccurate beliefs regarding nicotine harms persist among healthcare providers and are associated with beliefs about e-cigarette harms. Targeted education on the distinct risks of nicotine, e-cigarettes, and combustible tobacco products is crucial to improving understanding and to support evidence-based counseling on harm reduction strategies.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelNicotineAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesNicotine

Identifiers

PMID42228747
PMCPMC13229302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.