Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42228738›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Current use of specific wearables and factors that would motivate future use of wearables: Results based on the general German adult population.

André Hajek, Hans-Helmut König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

André HajekDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6886-2745
Hans-Helmut KönigDepartment of Health Economics and Health Services Research, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg Center for Health Economics, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA conscious use of wearables may be beneficial for health in general. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the current use of specific wearables and factors that would motivate future use of wearables in the German general adult population. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsData were taken from a quota-based online survey which took place in January 2026 (German general adult population, mean age of 47.3 years, 18-74 years, n = 2,591). Individuals were asked about their current use of specific wearables, and non-users were also asked about the factors that would motivate future use of wearables. Slightly more than one in three (34.8%) used one or more wearables. Based on the users, 80.8% used a smartwatch, and 24.3% used a fitness tracker, whereas only a small minority used other wearables (smart ring: 5.4%; smart clothing: 4.1%; smart glasses: 2.0%; hearables: 2.9%). Key factors that would motivate future use of wearables were (in descending order of frequency): need for medical monitoring (e.g., due to future chronic illnesses) (42.0%), lower prices (33.3%), interest in monitoring health (32.9%), health data as an incentive to lead a healthy lifestyle (27.2%), experience technological advances (18.2%), and greater user-friendliness (13.5%). Regressions showed that higher odds of currently using at least one wearable were associated with, among others, being married, living with a dog, leading a healthier lifestyle, and having more chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Apart from smartwatches, there is still a lot of potential for growth in user numbers for other wearables. We recommend research in other countries and based on longitudinal data.

Indexed as

MotivationWearable Electronic DevicesAdolescentAdultAgedDigital HealthFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42228738
PMCPMC13229337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.