ArticlePloS one2026
The prognostic value of the early neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for 28-day mortality in sepsis patients: A machine learning-based investigation of the MIMIC database.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has shown inconsistent prognostic value in individuals with sepsis. This study aimed to clarify its ability to predict 28-day mortality via a machine learning-based analysis of a large ICU database.
methodsThis retrospective analysis employed data from the MIMIC-IV database (v3.1). The Boruta algorithm combined with XGBoost was used for two-stage feature selection. Patients were stratified by NLR quartiles into three groups (low: <4.34, intermediate: 4.34-14.70, and high: >14.70). This study defined 28-day mortality as the primary outcome. Associations between the NLR and mortality were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression (progressively adjusted for demographic, clinical, and machine learning-derived features), along with restricted cubic splines. Sensitivity analyses included quantifying NLR feature importance via machine learning and performing subgroup analyses across clinical strata.
resultsThis cohort study included 4,376 patients with a 28-day mortality rate of 18.4%. Compared with the SOFA and SAPS II scores, the prediction performance of XGBoost was superior (ROC-AUC 0.875; 95% CI 0.854-0.896; PR-AUC 0.603). Although the NLR ranked 14th in SHAP-based feature importance, multivariable analysis confirmed its independent association with elevated mortality risk: 28-day (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.06-1.27; p < 0.001), in-hospital (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24; p < 0.001), and ICU (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.03-1.25; p = 0.008). Stratified analyses indicated consistent mortality associations for the NLR, with enhanced predictive value being observed in patients aged >45 years and those with SOFA scores ≤4 or SAPS II scores >29. Specifically, patients ≥65 years of age demonstrated a 17% increase in 28-day mortality risk (p = 0.019), and patients with a SOFA score ≤4 exhibited a greater than 20% elevated risk across all of the endpoints (p < 0.001), whereas no significant association was observed in the SOFA ≥9 subgroup (p = 0.369).
conclusionsThe NLR effectively identifies inflammation-driven mortality risk for early sepsis patients but fails to predict outcomes for patients with terminal organ failure. This biphasic predictive pattern highlights the unique value of the NLR in moderate sepsis risk stratification but cautions against its use in cases of advanced disease. Its value lies in dynamic monitoring rather than static risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.