ArticlePloS one2026
Tensor enhanced chest cancer classification via CNN and Vision Transformer models.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung diseases, particularly lung cancer, remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide, accounting for approximately 1.8 million deaths annually. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical for improving patient outcomes. This study also introduces a unified platform for evaluating multiple convolutional neural network architectures and comparing them to a Vision Transformer model while utilizing a common tensor-based preprocessing pipeline for classifying lung cancer with CT/PET-CT imaging. To enhance model adaptability, all input images were initially converted into tensors prior to training, enabling implicit fine-tuning without altering the original architecture. The YOLOTransfer dataset, comprising diverse and annotated medical images, was used to benchmark model performance. Classical CNN models such as AlexNet, VGG-16, ResNet-50, DenseNet, and EfficientNet were compared against ViT in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Among all models, ResNet-50 and EfficientNet achieved the highest accuracy, while the Vision Transformer showed competitive results in capturing complex global patterns. The findings highlight the complementary strengths of convolutional and transformer-based architectures for medical image analysis and demonstrate the feasibility of deep learning approaches for lung cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.