ArticlePloS one2026
Modeling of solid oxide fuel cells and optimal parameter extraction at various operating data using an optimization method.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One promising technology for a clean and effective energy conversion option is the solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) being developed for a broad, widespread role in mobile equipment power supply, and stationary power generation. In this endeavor, an optimal design model based on extracted unknown parameters of the SOFC stack, a dimensional nonlinear optimization problem, is developed using the Puma optimization algorithm (POA). The idea of predator-prey relationships in the natural world forms the basis of POA. By implementing innovative and powerful techniques at every stage of exploration and exploitation, this algorithm has enhanced its performance against a broad variety of optimization tasks. Additionally, a new class of intelligent mechanisms, which is a type of phase change hyper-heuristic, is proposed. There are four operating circumstances in which the stack model is tested: four temperatures in the range 923-1073 K and 3 bar, with two conditions for validation and the others for testing the model. The proposed POA is compared with several well-known algorithms. The findings of the simulation are contrasted with those from published works using the Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA), Moth Flame Algorithm (MFA), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), and Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), demonstrating the superior performance of POA in comparison to these competitive algorithms. Under different operating conditions, the computed polarization curves, V-I and P-I, closely resemble the measured datasets. Statistical indices and the ANOVA test confirm that there are differences in the mean values among the optimizer groups, demonstrating the viability and robustness of the proposed optimizer in comparison to other recent complex optimizers. Finally, the proposed POA yields significantly improved parameters with good convergence rates across various SOFC operating conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.