ArticlePloS one2026
A low-cost markerless motion capture system to automate functional gait assessment: Feasibility study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional gait assessments in older adults have traditionally required manual in-person quantification of clinical measures such as walking speed and step placement. This reliance on individuals trained in motion analysis hinders the frequency with which they are performed and reduces their generalizability and replicability. To standardize, simplify, and broaden access to gait assessments we here deploy recently-developed open-source tools to produce a low-cost, AI driven markerless motion capture system with custom analysis software for Functional Gait Assessment. Our system uses 3 Cameras and was validated with a traditional marker-based system on subjects (N = 3), showing strong correlation to laboratory-standard measures of step length (R2 = 0.98), step width (R2 = 0.97), and head speed (R2 = 0.95). The markerless system's FGA reports demonstrated data similar to previous FGA findings in older adult subjects (N = 5). Moreover, supplemental standard biomechanical gait measures Step Width, walking Duration, and continuous Gait Speed may be integrated to augment existing FGA. This study demonstrates a proof-of-principle open-source markerless system for analyses of functional gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.